Let’s leave Mindanao for a while and visit a place that also starts with “Mi” — Michigan. As I’ve written before, I was in the US for seven weeks last year to participate in the International Journalism Exchange (IJE) administered by the Washington, DC-based International Center for Journalists (ICFJ). When the program was done I spent a couple of weeks with family, first with my mother and brother in LA and then with my sister-in-law and her family in Troy, Michigan. Unfortunately I didn’t have a decent camera in LA, but I was able to buy a Lumix point-and-shoot in Michigan and was able to get some good pictures. Except for the shots in Stoney Creek (which were taken with my brother-in-law’s Nikon D80), all of these were taken with the Lumix — which just goes to show how much one can do with even a simple camera.

Click here or on the photo at right to go to the Gallery, and as always, please wait for all the thumbnails to load before clicking on any picture for a better viewing experience.

Random Posts:

• Fronting for Ivy Violan
• The GMA5 Energizer Night Race in Davao
• Good gig!
• How do you get to Carnegie Hall?
• Period of Peace

                          

On Sunday, December 13, Laya will be two years old, and to celebrate her birthday I am posting some of her pictures here. Click here or on the photo below to go to the Gallery, and as always, please wait for all the thumbnails to load before clicking on any picture for a better viewing experience.

She’s growing up so fast…

Random Posts:

• Same solid earth
• The GMA5 Energizer Night Race in Davao
• Different issues
• HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
• Davao

                          

Click here or on the picture at right to go to the gallery. (Tip: Wait for all the thumbnails to load before clicking on any photo for a better viewing experience)

Random Posts:

• Caned
• Training
• Labels
• You’ve found me!
• Acoustic Strat

                          

That joke is so widespread in New York City that the Carnegie Hall website alludes to it in the directions page of its website. But while it is meant to get some chuckles, it does emphasize one of the most important aspects of learning: practice, practice, practice.

I am reminded of this joke because when I asked Roji Gonzales, teenage son of my kumpare Jonji Gonzales of Cebu, to share his own tips on photography, this is what he said:

I’ll just give a simple tip that you may have heard many times before and this one’s not on the technical side. My tip is just “Practice Practice Practice, Don’t give up and have fun!” It’s all about the joy you get when u take that shot be it for money or no money. hehe. Because for young photographers like me, in order to make it to the top we just need to keep on going and improving and having fun while were at it.

Couldn’t have said it better myself.Random Posts:

• Same solid earth
• Looking up
• A dangerous precedent
• Shame on who?
• Once more, the Gretsch Vegas

                          

The Nikon F2 -- built like a tank

Most people I know don’t know that when I started as a journalist in 1994 (with the Mindanao Times), I was not just a reporter/editor but a photographer as well. I was among the few — or was I the only one? — who brought not just a notepad but also a single lens reflex (SLR) camera to coverage. Back in those days I had a Nikon F2, a heavy, professional-level SLR that took great pictures and was built like a tank — perfect for running after persons and events when the last thing I could worry about was taking care that I don’t bump my equipment. That camera could really take punishment.

So imagine me in those pre-digital days conducting interviews, taking down notes, and waiting for the opportune time to lift my camera to my eye and take a few pictures. Unlike other Nikons of that time, the F2 — which was already two generations behind as far as the professional line was concerned — didn’t have autofocus and was fully manual, so I had to make sure of my focus and my exposure before taking each shot. I also had to make sure I had the right flash setting since TTL (through the lens) and dedicated flashes were unheard of when Nikon built the F2. All these considerations were important because I had to maximize my film not just because they were expensive but also because I had to make sure I still had frames remaining in case something explosive happened.

Negatives -- remember those?

And having taken pictures, I still had to rush to the photo lab to get the film developed and then — to save money — look at the negatives to pick out the pictures I wanted to print. Often I would do this in the lull between writing my own reports and editing those of other reporters, and it was a good thing that at least there were already one-hour labs at the time. Once the prints were out, I would rush back to the newsroom where I would continue working well into the night, writing, editing, captioning, laying out, and making coffee.

I can’t say I miss those pre-digital days, but I appreciate the fact that those technically difficult times taught me a lot about being resourceful and being skillful. I also learned not to be dependent on equipment or to lust after the newest ones because I knew that what I had — a camera two generations behind — was enough to get the work done. I had to make each shot count because there was no PhotoShop then (or at the most it was still in its infancy) to save badly exposed pictures. And being a Third World newspaper, the Times couldn’t afford to give me a bigger budget on film, which would have at least allowed me to take numerous pictures from which I could pick the best ones (Hint: that’s the secret of all professional photographers).

These days, of course, digital cameras do practically all the work for us. All of them offer some form of automation, and setting the dial to “A” (or its equivalent, depending on the brand and model) gives us good results most of the time. But from my conversations with old hands, many photographers who are old enough to have switched from film to digital still carry with them their old habits, and that is a good thing. Most of them still take care that they have the right exposure, and many of them go manual to make sure they get what they want. And as I have found myself, getting a picture right from “click” is the best way to get a memorable photo.

Babusanta pier, taken by yours truly with just a point-and-shoot digital camera. (Click on this and the other two images below to visit my Flickr site)

Diver boy

Geese at Kensington Park, MI, taken last year when I participated in a journalism exchange.

I am not, however, about to diss digital photography as being for amateurs. In fact, I happen to believe that digital technology is one of the best thing to have happened to photography. Aside from automation, digital technology has allowed for smaller and more discreet cameras that are getting cheaper and cheaper. The chief disadvantage of professional photographers is that the cameras and lenses they need — those that are feature-rich — are usually big; while these to allow them to take better pictures, the cameras also make them stick out in a crowd and ruin any chance of them getting “candid” shots. The smaller point-and-shoots are better at this, and I’ve seen many casual snapshooters take great shots with them. (Next: Photography for the Facebook generation)Random Posts:

• Full disclosure
• What a English!
• The other side of boxing
• Remember the Maguindanao Martyrs
• The (red) letter